Expectations for the Future Life of Migrants in Beijing, China: A Cross-sectional Study

Authors

  • L. Hu School of Management and Engineering, Capital University of Economics and Business, China.
  • S. N. Liu School of Management and Engineering, Capital University of Economics and Business, China.
  • Z. Q. Yan School of Management and Engineering, Capital University of Economics and Business, China.
  • Y. S. Liu School of Management and Engineering, Capital University of Economics and Business, China.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rdass/v3/15929D

Keywords:

Expectations for the future life, migrants, life course stage, utility of life, Beijing

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the theorisation of the expectations for the future life (EFL) of migrants whose household registration (hukou) is not in Beijing, China. Although the EFL of many rural-urban migrants is explicit, the EFL type of other migrants such as educated people and the formation mechanism of EFL of migrants are much less well understood. We argue that EFL is a person’s pre-judgment or estimation of living conditions in the future based on his/her perception of current human well-being or utility of life and its main concern is whether he/she expects to live in the city in the future. Based on the social production functions (SPF) theory, three types of EFL for migrants are identified by using data collected from in-depth interviews with 30 Beijing’s in-migrants. This paper reveals that the EFL of migrants is formed by comparing their current actual utility of life with the “normative utility” in the specific life course stage, which is the life utility that people should have in their specific life course stage expected by the society. Finally, these findings are checked out that the theoretical saturation has been reached by applying another 9 copies of transcripts of interviewees.

Published

2022-05-06

How to Cite

L. Hu, S. N. Liu, Z. Q. Yan, & Y. S. Liu. (2022). Expectations for the Future Life of Migrants in Beijing, China: A Cross-sectional Study. Research Developments in Arts and Social Studies Vol. 3, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rdass/v3/15929D