Analysis of the Comparative Study on Flower Pigments with Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase Activity in Orchid Plants

Authors

  • Suat Hian Tan Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Tecehnology, College of Computing and Applied Sciences, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300 Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.
  • Nyuk Ling Ma School of Fundamental Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • Wan Nurul Hidayah Wan Anuar Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, Tapah Road, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/ciees/v3/7922D

Keywords:

Chlorophyll, carotenoid, anthocyanin, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase

Abstract

Background: Orchidaceae plants have been one of the most important industrial products in the agricultural industry around the world. Since the flower petals have eye-catching pigments, they can be used as cut flowers in addition to being potted flowers.

Objective: The key pigments found in orchid flower petals were studied, as well as their relationships to phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity.

Results: Total anthocyanin content of six different orchids’ petals was determined specthrophotometrically and the value ranged from 0 mg/g (in Dendrobium Shavin white) to 2.128 mg/g (in Mokara Aranda). The petals with vivid colour have a high amount of anthocyanin content, while, they have a high amount of chlorophyll content for those with pale colour. Total anthocyanin content was found to be the highest when compare to ?-carotene and chlorophyll content. PAL behaviour was found to be significantly positive associated with anthocyanin content in correlation analysis.

Conclusion: The results indicate the potential for PAL enzyme as a biomarker for flower colour in orchids.

Published

2021-04-27

How to Cite

Suat Hian Tan, Nyuk Ling Ma, & Wan Nurul Hidayah Wan Anuar. (2021). Analysis of the Comparative Study on Flower Pigments with Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase Activity in Orchid Plants. Challenging Issues on Environment and Earth Science Vol. 3, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/ciees/v3/7922D