Understanding Motivations and Experiences of Foster Families in Portugal

Authors

  • Elisete Diogo Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Católica Research Centre for Psychological – Family and Social Wellbeing; CICS.NOVA – Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais da Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa; Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre, Portugal.
  • Francisco Branco Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Católica Research Centre for Psychological – Family and Social Wellbeing, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/sthss/v1/8430D

Keywords:

Child welfare, foster families, social work, policy making, Portugal

Abstract

Foster care is an almost absent component in the childcare system and scientific research conducted in Portugal foster comprises 2.7% of out-of-home care in Portugal. This research aims to contribute to a deeper visibility of the care phenomena, giving specific attention to the foster families themselves. This research adopted a qualitative analytical approach, inspired by Grounded Theory. Foster families’ motivation is rooted in altruism, affection for children, and sensitivity to maltreatment. Personal and professional biography or past contact with out-of-home care can also induce predisposition to become a carer. The experience of being a carer is one of traversing through a life of many challenges and rewards. Considering the recognition from the stakeholders, it is a rewarding task. The quality of the service provided, and the performance of the care professionals are both key elements to foster care. The quality of support services and the performance of care professionals are key elements for the success of fostering. The genesis and practical implementation of these measures is manifestly disparate when related to the current Portuguese legislative requirements.

Published

2021-05-31

How to Cite

Elisete Diogo, & Francisco Branco. (2021). Understanding Motivations and Experiences of Foster Families in Portugal. Selected Topics in Humanities and Social Sciences Vol. 1, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/sthss/v1/8430D