Approximate Determination of J Integral for Cracked Structures

Authors

  • Lubomir Gajdos Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i. Prosecká 809/76, 190 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Martin Sperl Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i. Prosecká 809/76, 190 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Jiri Kuzelka Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4,166 07 Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Jan Kec SVUM a.s., Tovarni 2053, 250 88 Celakovice, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rtcams/v9/2660B

Keywords:

Crack, stress intensity factor, J integral, stress concentration, strain energy density, Ramberg–Osgood relation, linepipe steels X52, X70

Abstract

A method, designated as the GSM method, for the assessment of the J integral of cracked components subjected to uniform normal stress is compared with the Js procedure of the French RCC-MR construction code, designated here as the FC method, for centre cracked plates, single edge cracked plates, double edge cracked plates produced from X52 and X70 steels, and for longitudinally cracked pipe produced from X70 steel. The "reference" values of the J integral for cracked plates were calculated using the EPRI method. The main objective of the study was to show that the GSM method provides reliable predictions of the J integral for cracked plates and pipes. A comparison of results obtained using the GSM and FC methods shows that both methods provide similar results, although in most cases, the GSM method results are slightly more conservative than those predicted by the FC method. Both techniques yield conservative results for most fracture configurations when compared to the "reference" values of the J integral, while estimates for cracks with a relative length less than 1/8 were not found to be as conservative. External longitudinal semielliptical part-through cracks in X70 steel pipe were likewise predicted using the two approaches. When compared to FEM calculations and experimentally determined burst pressures, the magnitudes of the projected burst pressures were extremely similar to each other and were conservative.

Published

2022-06-22

How to Cite

Lubomir Gajdos, Martin Sperl, Jiri Kuzelka, & Jan Kec. (2022). Approximate Determination of J Integral for Cracked Structures. Recent Trends in Chemical and Material Sciences Vol. 9, 50–77. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rtcams/v9/2660B