The Comeback Home of WWII American Veterans: Social Consequences

Authors

  • Antonio Daniel Juan Rubio Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Spain.
  • Isabel María García Conesa Centro Universitario de la Defensa San Javier, Spain.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rdass/v7/3363A

Keywords:

American veterans, G.I. Bill, reintegration, social rehabilitation, social measures

Abstract

The end of the Second World War in 1945 brought many American soldiers home, though they did not return to the prosperous country that had existed during the war time. The economy had greatly benefited from the war effort, but when it was all over, the thousands of jobs that had been created across the nation disappeared and the American economy suffered because of that. Although the dropping of the atomic bombs over Japan made the war end more quickly than expected, the country was still not ready for conversion. As a consequence, this forced the Truman’s administration to return America’s economy to normal, which resulted in a period of economic troubles, by means of a specific plan for rehabilitation and reintegration to civilian life.
The G.I. Bill, often referred to as the Service Readjustment Act of 1944, was a significant piece of legislation that offered a number of benefits to returning World War II veterans. This law, which was enacted in the United States in June 1944 and later became Public Law 78-346, is available to all veterans who served during the war years. Of the numerous connected measures that the US administration hurried, it was the most illustrative and striking. The main objective throughout this paper will lay the focus primarily on the major social consequences that the adoption of the various measures undertaken had on American society in the late 40s, especially after the return home of the Second World War veterans.

Published

2022-08-29

How to Cite

Antonio Daniel Juan Rubio, & Isabel María García Conesa. (2022). The Comeback Home of WWII American Veterans: Social Consequences. Research Developments in Arts and Social Studies Vol. 7, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rdass/v7/3363A