Exploring the Psychometric Properties of School-based Assessment Instrument

Authors

  • Nor Hasnida Md. Ghazali Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.
  • Syaza Hazwani Zaini Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.
  • Mahizer Hamzah Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.
  • Noor Insyirah Abu Bakar Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/pller/v2/11258F

Keywords:

CIPP model evaluation, exploratory factor analysis, school-based assessment

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of an instrument for implementing school-based assessment (SBA) in schools. In the Malaysian context, SBA consists of four components which are school assessment, central assessment, psychometric assessment and physical activity, sport and co-curriculum assessment.  Daniel Stufflebeam's conceptual framework, known as the CIPP (context, input, process, and product) Evaluation Model, served as the foundation for the development of the instrument.  This pilot study was conducted at the primary and secondary schools in Melaka, a state at the south of Peninsular Malaysia.  In this study, the instrument in the form of questionnaire is distributed to a sample of 120 primary and secondary school teachers. There is an 80% response rate.  Experts evaluate the content validity, while exploratory factor analysis (EFA) measures the construct validity.  Internal consistency reliability, which is determined by alpha coefficient reliability or Cronbach Alpha, is used to assess the instrument's reliability.  This pilot study's findings indicate that the instrument is valid and trustworthy. Finally, 68 things are kept out of a total of 71.

Published

2023-12-06

How to Cite

Nor Hasnida Md. Ghazali, Syaza Hazwani Zaini, Mahizer Hamzah, & Noor Insyirah Abu Bakar. (2023). Exploring the Psychometric Properties of School-based Assessment Instrument. Progress in Language, Literature and Education Research Vol. 2, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/pller/v2/11258F