Myths of Labour Analgesia

Authors

  • Avinash Prakash Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
  • Anita Yadav Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/namms/v4/5223C

Keywords:

Vaginal delivery, pregnancy and childbirth, analgesia, reasons for acceptance or rejection

Abstract

In developing nations, labour analgesia is still very infrequently used and accepted. Only 7.14% of potential mothers knew about labour analgesia. In comparison to primigravida and multiparous women, the nulliparous wanted considerably less labour analgesia (p 0.003). The most frequent justification for rejecting painless labour was a desire to give birth naturally. One-fourth of the participants thought that labour analgesia was harmful to the unborn child and against God's will. Although there is a lack of understanding and acceptance of labour analgesia, women with prior experience were significantly more receptive to it. Another significant factor in why labour analgesia is not widely accepted is false information.

Published

2023-05-29

How to Cite

Avinash Prakash, & Anita Yadav. (2023). Myths of Labour Analgesia. New Advances in Medicine and Medical Science Vol. 4, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/namms/v4/5223C