Operating Room Set Up in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery

Authors

  • Alessandra Alfieri Department of Neurosurgery “S. Anna e S. Sebastiano” Hospital of Caserta, Italy.
  • Paola Flavia Schettino Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
  • Luisa Scognamiglio Department of Neurosurgery “S. Anna e S. Sebastiano” Hospital of Caserta, Italy.
  • Nunzio Guarino Department of Neurosurgery “S. Anna e S. Sebastiano” Hospital of Caserta, Italy.
  • Raffaele Schettino Italian Air Force Healthcare, Caserta, Italy.
  • Giovanni Schettino International University School of Engineering, UNIMORE, Modena, Italy.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/msti/v11/4764

Keywords:

Skull base surgery, operative room assessment, 3D endoscope, ergonomics

Abstract

Since the introduction of endoscopic endonasal surgery for skull base pathologies in the 1990s, increasing experience with this technique has led to many progressive changes in patient positioning, technique, and set-up in the operating room. In addition, new surgical instruments have been developed for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. The experience in assessing the operating room and surgical instruments in the last 267 endoscopic endonasal skull base procedures was reported. The endoscopic technique has broadened the indications for endonasal skull base pathology. This technique always requires a previous cadaveric study in the laboratory in order to have a precise knowledge of the anatomy from an endonasal point of view. Since the first procedures, dealing with intraoperative hemorrhage was learned. The 3D technique has been used in the last 57 procedures and has improved the overall depth perception, with a true microscope-like view and better control of the lesion and neurovascular structures.

Published

2025-03-26

How to Cite

Alessandra Alfieri, Paola Flavia Schettino, Luisa Scognamiglio, Nunzio Guarino, Raffaele Schettino, & Giovanni Schettino. (2025). Operating Room Set Up in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. Medical Science: Trends and Innovations Vol. 11, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/msti/v11/4764