A Comparative Study on using Contingency Table Approaches in Differential Item Functioning Analysis

Authors

  • Jose Quito Pedrajita Educational Research and Evaluation Department, Division of Educational Leadership and Professional Services, University of the Philippines College of Education, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mplle/v8/3998F

Keywords:

Contingency table approaches, differential item functioning, differential item functioning analysis, item bias

Abstract

This study provides a demonstration of differential item functioning (DIF) analysis. It made use of test scores of 200 junior high school students on a Chemistry Achievement Test, a measure tested for its psychometric properties. One hundred students came from a public school, while the other 100 were private school examinees; one hundred students were males and the other 100 were females; and 95 students were of low ability and 105 students were of high ability based on their English II grades. Four contingency table approaches, the Chi-Square, Distractor Response Analysis, Logistic Regression and the Mantel-Haenszel Statistic, were applied in the DIF analysis to identify test items indicating bias between examinees matched on school type, gender, and English ability. Thereafter, the results for the four approaches were compared. The findings revealed the presence of items indicating school type-, gender-, and English ability-based DIF. There was a high degree of correspondence between the Logistic Regression and the Mantel-Haenszel Statistic in identifying potentially biased test items.

Published

2021-08-10

How to Cite

Jose Quito Pedrajita. (2021). A Comparative Study on using Contingency Table Approaches in Differential Item Functioning Analysis. Modern Perspectives in Language, Literature and Education Vol. 8, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mplle/v8/3998F