Aesthetic and Clinical Parameters for Immediate Implant Placement

Authors

  • P. Moerbeck São Paulo State University, Brazil.
  • R. C. Cardoso São Paulo State University, Brazil.
  • L. G. Moerbeck Salvador University, Brazil.
  • Cardoso Ptlo UNIARA University, Brazil.
  • M. A. Barreto Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Bahia, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/idhr/v8/14426D

Keywords:

Immediate implant, bone reconstruction, autograft, immediate prosthesis, case report

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to promote a literature review parameters for the use of autograft in the immediate implant temporization in the aesthetic area, as well as to present a case report. The ranges of rehabilitation with implants have shrunk as technology, science, and industry have advanced. This technique, known as implant with immediate temporization (TIPP), is one of the topics being debated today, as the desire for aesthetic perfection grows. The fact that the anterior bone atrophy is caused by progressive bone size and nutrition in this area is quite limited endangers this aesthetic. TIPP use can be influenced by a number of factors, including implant type, bone quality and quantity, primary stability, occlusion, gingival biotype, bony walls of the gap, gap filling material, prosthetic platform used, and prosthesis type, among others. It was discovered that the patient to be evaluated unit 22 had persistent endodontic injury, bone loss in adjacent walls, and a shift pin. It was concluded that the proposed treatment produces satisfactory results in the short term. According to the literature, a recession is an impending technique. In patients with a thin biotype, a connective graft should be associated. This appears to have an impact on prosperous gingival architecture in order to achieve aesthetically pleasing rehabilitation. However, a longer study and follow-up are required to find ways to reduce buccal recession. Prosthetic platform used, the prosthesis type used, among others. It was discovered that the patient to be evaluated unit 22 had persistent endodontic injury, bone loss in adjacent walls, and a shift pin. It was concluded that, in the short term, the proposed treatment presents satisfactory results.

Published

2021-12-29

How to Cite

P. Moerbeck, R. C. Cardoso, L. G. Moerbeck, Cardoso Ptlo, & M. A. Barreto. (2021). Aesthetic and Clinical Parameters for Immediate Implant Placement. Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 8, 40–62. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/idhr/v8/14426D