Determine the Effect of Egg Mass and Egg Weight Groups on Fertilization, Loss of Weight during the Incubation Period, Hatchability, and Gosling Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/ibs/v2/7546BKeywords:
Egg weight, geese, gosling weight, incubation, weight lossAbstract
The main purpose of the study was to determine the effect of egg mass and egg weight groups (group I eggs under 160 g, group II eggs160 g to 180 g and group III eggs over 180 g) on incubation results, loss of egg weight (moist) during incubation, gosling hatchability, and the relative share of the gosling in the egg mass. A well fertilized egg is an embryo “package” with all the necessary nutrients that facilitate its development until it is hatched and for a few days after hatching. The results of poultry offspring production, i.e., poultry embryo development, depend during its embryonic development, – apart from its genetic basis, – on several non-genetic factors. Eggs with mass between 160 g and 180 g (group II) demonstrated the highest fertilization rate (91.28%) and the highest hatchability out of the number of incubated eggs (83.14%), while the eggs from the group I (lighter than 160 g) showed the highest number of gosling hatchability out of the number of fertilized eggs (91.08%). The lowest embryo mortality was that of group I (5.17% and 6.06%), while the highest is reported for group III (14.29% and 16.67%). The lowest relative loss of egg mass (moist) by day 25 of the incubation period was established for the group I eggs (10.98%), and the highest for the group III (11.71%), with a statistically significant (P<0.01) difference of -0.73 %. Other differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The gosling percentage in the egg mass was significantly higher (P<0.001) in the group III of incubated eggs (67.81%) than in group II (66.61%) and group I (65.24%). The relative gosling percentage according to the egg mass grew with the increase of the egg mass, which to a certain extent agreed with our findings, except that these authors reported a considerably lower gosling percentage.