Urological Cancers Presentations in Manipur –are they Different from Other Regions of India?

Authors

  • Desai Fanny S. Department of Surgical Pathology, Himalaya Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Vadodara, Gujarat-390007, India.
  • Nongthombam Jitendra Department of Urology, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur-795 003, India.
  • Lisam Shanjukumar Singh Department of Biotechnology, Manipur University, Imphal, Manipur-795003, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/etdhr/v1/1520B

Keywords:

Urological cancers, tumour characteristics, North Eastern Region of India

Abstract

Little is known about urological cancers characteristics in Manipur, a north eastern state of India and how tumour characteristics are different from other regions of India.

Aims and objectives: We conducted the present study to analyze the frequency, clinical presentation, the histopathological type, grade and stage of various adult urological cancers in Manipur retrospectively and compared them to that of other regions of India statistically. 

Material and Methods: Data were retrieved from hospital and histopathology records during the period between June 2012 and June 2014.

Results: Total 42 urological cancers were found, among which adult renal carcinoma were (7.1%), upper urinary tract carcinoma (14.3%) with male to female ratio 1:5, urinary bladder carcinoma (45.2%) with male to female ratio (1.7:1), urethral carcinoma (2.4%), prostatic carcinoma (26.2%), testis (2.4%) and penis (2.4%).

Conclusion: Prostate carcinoma in Manipur presented at later age with higher grade and urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder presented at later age with higher grade and lower male to female ratio than compared regions of India. (Fisher’s exact test p value was <0.001).

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Desai Fanny S., Nongthombam Jitendra, & Lisam Shanjukumar Singh. (2021). Urological Cancers Presentations in Manipur –are they Different from Other Regions of India?. Emerging Trends in Disease and Health Research Vol. 1, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/etdhr/v1/1520B