Low-cost Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in Poor Resource Settings A Review

Authors

  • Nandini Manoli Department of Pathology, JSS Medical College, JSS University, India.
  • Sherin S. Mathew Department of Pathology, JSS Medical College, JSS University, India.
  • Devananda Devegowda Department of Biochemistry, JSS Medical College, JSS University, India.
  • Ashoka Varshini Panga Department of Pathology, JSS Medical College, JSS University, India.
  • Nandish Manoli Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, JSS Medical College, JSS University, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cpms/v1/6518F

Keywords:

Cervical cancer, screening methods, low resource settings, conventional pap smear, manual liquid-based cytology

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most prevalent disease among women and the seventh most common cancer worldwide, with 528,000 new cases reported in 2012. Cervical cancer has fallen in relative importance, despite the fact that the annual number of cases has increased: it was the second most prevalent disease in women in 1975. Furthermore, the incidence and mortality of CC varies significantly across low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). In low-resource settings, cost-effective alternatives to conventional pap smear screening are needed to detect cervical cancer. The study objectives are 1)to study the utility of various screening methods like conventional pap smear. In low and middle income countries (LMIC), many new strategies are being implemented to improve detection at a low cost. Manual liquid based cytology (MLBC), HPV testing, cell block with marker studies, and ascetic acid ocular inspection are the tests covered (VIA). National screening programs in LMIC nations should implement the various methodologies.

Published

2022-06-21

How to Cite

Nandini Manoli, Sherin S. Mathew, Devananda Devegowda, Ashoka Varshini Panga, & Nandish Manoli. (2022). Low-cost Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in Poor Resource Settings A Review. Current Practice in Medical Science Vol. 1, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cpms/v1/6518F