A Sedentary Lifestyle and Cognitive Function

Authors

  • Arbind Kumar Choudhary Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Sundareswaran Loganathan Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Guwahati, Assam, India.
  • Kuppusamy Maheshkumar Department of Biochemistry and Physiology, Government Yoga and Naturopathy Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cdhr/v6/7457D

Keywords:

Sedentary, cognition, mental health, dementia

Abstract

Sedentary behaviour is hypothesized to be a potential target in its own right—the rising numbers of persons with cognitive impairment highlight the urgency to understand these risk factors better. Higher sedentary behaviour levels are associated with reduced global cognitive functioning and slower cognitive decline, especially in older persons.  Neuropsychological evaluations can be categorized according to the domain of thought being tested. The domains can be considered such as  Global cognition (e.g., the Mini-Mental State Examination), concentration (sustained alertness, including the ability to process information quickly), executive function (a collection of cognitive mechanisms responsible for initiating and tracking goal-oriented behaviours), memory (storing and retrieving goal-oriented behaviours), and working memory (short-term manipulation of information encountered). A sedentary activity can occur with subsequent factors such as depression, the habit of drinking and smoking, social distancing and occupation, sleep disruption, disease history, and eventually lead to cognitive impairment. Although preliminary evidence indicates that cognitive function is associated with a sedentary activity, it is still uncertain of this relationship's extent.  

Published

2021-06-07

How to Cite

Arbind Kumar Choudhary, Sundareswaran Loganathan, & Kuppusamy Maheshkumar. (2021). A Sedentary Lifestyle and Cognitive Function. Challenges in Disease and Health Research Vol. 6, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cdhr/v6/7457D