Dilemmas in Grading Epidermoid Carcinoma: An Overview

Authors

  • Varun Rastogi Department of Oral Pathology, UCMS, Bhairahawa, Nepal.
  • Nisha Maddheshiya Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, IMS, Faculty of Dental Sciences, BHU, Varanasi, India.
  • Nitin Sangwan Department of Periodontology, UCMS, Bhairahawa, Nepal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/anums/v1/6923C

Keywords:

Oral cancer, grading systems, clinical staging, head and neck, prognosis

Abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) can be preceded by the appearance of lesions which have the potential either to develop into cancer or signal the development of cancer in the oral cavity. Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the 8th most common cancer worldwide, with a predisposition for low-income populations, and greater prevalence in older men, 90% being in the 45-year-age group. Histologic grading has been used as a prognostic factor and for clinical evaluation of OSCC for the past several decades. Simultaneously, there exists ongoing controversy surrounding the predictive significance of various grading classifications. Consequently, our article undertakes a comprehensive examination of diverse grading systems for oral squamous cell carcinoma and assesses their prognostic implications.

Published

2024-01-08

How to Cite

Varun Rastogi, Nisha Maddheshiya, & Nitin Sangwan. (2024). Dilemmas in Grading Epidermoid Carcinoma: An Overview. Advancement and New Understanding in Medical Science Vol. 1, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/anums/v1/6923C