Dispersion Models for Waste Stabilization Pond: A Comparative Analysis

Authors

  • Uneke A. Louis Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Kenule Beeson Saro Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • Akpan P. Paul Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Technology, Federal University of Technology, Ikot Abasi, Akwa, Ibom State, Nigeria.
  • Nwikina B. Bariene Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Kenule Beeson Saro Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • Kanee Sorbari Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology, Kenule Beeson Saro Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • Oba L. Achemie Department of Civil Engineering, Rivers State University, Nkpolu, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • Abednego G. T. George Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Kenule Beeson Saro Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • Anea-Bari D. Burabe Department of Surveying, Kenule Beeson Saro Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • Letam P. Leelee Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Kenule Beeson Saro Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori, Rivers State, Nigeria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/acst/v7/7194A

Keywords:

Waste stabilization pond, dispersion coefficient, model, pollution, treatment unit, average velocity, flow time

Abstract

Dispersion number (d) is the most basic factor of measurement in hydraulic modeling of pollution in waste stabilization ponds and its accuracy is important to measure the characteristic behavior of pollutants in the pond. Tracer experiments were performed in a laboratory channel to determine concentration of solute and dispersion number for different flows through the channel. Two methods of sample collection were adopted: (1) constant-time-variable-distance and (2) constant-distance-variable–time apperoches. Five dispersion models used in the determination of dispersion number in waste stabilization ponds namely Levenspiel and smith [1], Liu [2], Polprasert and Bhatarai, Taylor [3] and Agunwamba and Uneke [4] were used to determine the phenomena and compared. Model calculations showed that Liu’s model is closest to that of Levenspiel and Smith which is used as standard for tracer concentration measurement dispersion number in ponds. Lui’s model may then be used for design of new ponds. Agunwamba’s model follows after Liu’s in closeness but overestimates peak concentration by about 3 times the measured. It is however better than Levenspiels in that it is time saving and cost effective. Unlike Liu’s model, Agunwamba’s model cannot be used in design of new ponds.

Published

2023-10-14

How to Cite

Uneke A. Louis, Akpan P. Paul, Nwikina B. Bariene, Kanee Sorbari, Oba L. Achemie, Abednego G. T. George, … Letam P. Leelee. (2023). Dispersion Models for Waste Stabilization Pond: A Comparative Analysis. Advances and Challenges in Science and Technology Vol. 7, 65–94. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/acst/v7/7194A